mTOR Academy · Practice
Practice Arena
Eight games built on the Atlas's own pathway model and its own studies. Points reward calibration, not speed — and nothing here rewards simply showing up.
The pathway is the board you are playing on. Every question you answer colours in a piece of it — and two of its questions are ones the field itself has not closed, so they never fill in.
Your pathway and badges →Daily 5
Two you have seen, two new, one a level up. Three minutes.
Signal Sprint
Sixty seconds of arrows: does this one activate or inhibit?
Wire the Pathway
Rebuild a route from loose parts — and get the direct steps right.
Perturbation Lab
Set the controls, predict the readout before it is revealed.
What It Doesn't Show
One experiment from a lesson, four conclusions. Which one does it not prove?
Paper Autopsy
One real paper. Which limit of its design (sample, species, dose, length) matters here?
Find the Evidence
A claim from the map. Which study in the Atlas is it standing on?
Frontier
Established, emerging, contested or open? Say where the field actually is.
Progress lives in this browser only. No account, nothing sent anywhere. Export it if you want to move it.
How the points work
Points are called XP. Every number you see with a plus sign — +8 XP, +30 XP — is XP added to the total in the bar above; the ranks are XP thresholds. Every question asks how sure you are before the answer appears. Being right while sure is worth the most; being right while unsure is worth less; being wrong while sure is worth nothing at all. There are no points for opening a page, no daily-login bonus and no streak to lose — the only thing that earns anything here is a judgement that could have been wrong.
Open questions never reach full mastery. That is not a bug in the game — the field has not closed them.
Practice questions
This page needs JavaScript for scoring and for saving progress in this browser. The practice questions themselves are below in full, with answers — the page is readable and usable without it.
What kind of molecule is mTOR?
- A hormone the body releases when food is plentiful
- A protein kinase — an enzyme that attaches phosphate groups to other proteins
- A transcription factor that binds DNA at growth genes
- A structural protein that holds the lysosome together
Answer: B. mTOR is an enzyme. It changes what other proteins do by phosphorylating them, and everything downstream in this course follows from that one activity.
Which subunit is the one that defines mTORC1 rather than mTORC2?
- RICTOR
- SIN1
- RAPTOR
- mLST8
Answer: C. RAPTOR is the mTORC1-defining partner and RICTOR and SIN1 belong to mTORC2. mLST8 is the distractor worth remembering, because it sits in both complexes.
Which form of Rheb is the direct positive input to mTORC1 in the standard model?
- Rheb-GDP
- Rheb-GTP
- Both forms equally
- Neither — Rheb acts only on mTORC2
Answer: B. Rheb is a switch protein whose two nucleotide states behave differently, and it is the GTP-bound state that activates the kinase. Everything the TSC complex does is about how much Rheb-GTP there is.
What does it mean that TSC2 acts as a GAP for Rheb?
- It binds Rheb and physically blocks its interaction with mTORC1
- It accelerates Rheb's hydrolysis of its own bound GTP, pushing Rheb toward the GDP state
- It loads Rheb with fresh GTP
- It degrades Rheb protein
Answer: B. A GTPase-activating protein speeds up a reaction the GTPase already performs. That is why the TSC complex sets a rate rather than flipping a switch, and why the amount of Rheb-GTP is a balance.
What holds the Rag GTPases at the lysosomal surface?
- Rheb
- The Ragulator complex
- RAPTOR
- TFEB
Answer: B. The Rags are not membrane-anchored on their own. Ragulator tethers them to the lysosome and acts on their nucleotide state, which is what makes the surface a platform rather than a passive membrane.
Which amino acid does Sestrin2 bind?
- Arginine
- Leucine
- Glutamine
- Methionine
Answer: B. Sestrin2 is the leucine-binding protein of this set; CASTOR1 handles arginine and SAMTOR reads S-adenosylmethionine, the metabolite downstream of methionine.
‘‘mTOR controls growth’’ — which of these does the evidence behind this claim not support?
- That mTOR activity shifts the balance between building programs and recycling programs in the systems where this has been measured
- That mTOR is the only route to growth, or that removing it stops growth in every cell
- That several unrelated kinds of information reach the same kinase, which is what makes it worth calling an integrator
Answer: B. Almost everything in this lesson was worked out in cultured cells and in laboratory animals, and the summary sentence compresses a network with many parallel inputs and outputs into one verb. The compression is useful for learning and it is not a finding; when you meet a claim about mTOR and human health later in the Atlas, the evidence tier attached to it is doing real work.
‘What ‘mTORC1-selective’ can and cannot mean’ — which of these does the evidence behind this claim not support?
- That the two complexes differ in composition and in substrates, and that the difference is visible both chemically and genetically
- That rapamycin blocks some mTORC1 outputs much more completely than others
- That any compound is selective as a property independent of dose, duration and cell type
Answer: C. Every study cited in this lesson is M or A: biochemistry, cell work and mouse genetics. That is the honest state of complex-level evidence. Selectivity in particular is a claim about an experiment, and the experiment has a duration — which is exactly the thing summaries drop.
‘What this lesson's evidence supports, and what it does not’ — which of these does the evidence behind this claim not support?
- The TSC complex acts as a GAP for Rheb, which is how growth-factor and stress signals reach the pathway
- Rheb contributes to mTORC1 activation, and its GTP-bound state is the form that does it
- That Rheb is the only determinant of mTORC1 activity
- Localisation is part of the mechanism rather than a detail drawn on top of it
Answer: C. Several of the foundational experiments in this lesson raised the amount of a protein far above its normal level in order to see its effect. That design is informative about what a protein can do and much weaker evidence about what it normally does — and the studies below are M and A, which marks the design, not the quality.
Which limitation is the one this study states about itself? — Read the design, not the wording.
mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation (2009, Mouse)
mTOR is a key regulator of memory CD8 T-cell differentiation; rapamycin enhances memory responses.
Sample: not stated
- No lifespan or healthspan endpoint. Side-effect endpoints only; benefit retention is inferred, not tested.
- Inference from a single exceptional responder; basis of mTOR-inhibitor sensitivity incompletely understood; short drug exposure in some.
- FDA changed the primary endpoint between phase 2b and phase 3 (symptom-based vs lab-confirmed), complicating comparison; positive biomarker did not translate to…
- mTOR knockdown does not completely mimic rapamycin treatment.
Answer: D. Its own limitation, as recorded in the Atlas: mTOR knockdown does not completely mimic rapamycin treatment.
Which limitation is the one this study states about itself? — Read the design, not the wording.
Alternative rapamycin treatment regimens mitigate the impact of rapamycin on glucose homeostasis and the immune system (2015, Mouse)
Mice given rapamycin every day (2 mg/kg) developed glucose intolerance (the glucose curve was about 71% higher), raised fasting glucose and insulin, and their pancreatic islets released less insulin. The same dose given once every 5 days did not impair…
Sample: 9-11 male C57BL/6J mice per treatment group for glucose tolerance tests; 3-6 mice per group for blood rapamycin concentration; 4-9 mice per group for…
- Histological evaluation of cataracts was limited to a small number of specimens; site-to-site variation was considerable for spontaneous activity; some observed trends…
- Inference from rare responders; basis of mTOR-inhibitor sensitivity beyond TSC1/2 loss still incompletely understood.
- No lifespan or healthspan endpoint. Side-effect endpoints only; benefit retention is inferred, not tested.
- Specific inhibitors of mTORC2 are unavailable, precluding pharmacological testing.
Answer: C. Its own limitation, as recorded in the Atlas: No lifespan or healthspan endpoint. Side-effect endpoints only; benefit retention is inferred, not tested.
How settled is this, as the field stands? — 4E-BP1 inhibits eIF4E
Unphosphorylated 4E-BP1 clamps onto eIF4E and stops it assembling the cap-binding complex. mTORC1 phosphorylates 4E-BP1 to release that grip - so the brake on translation is released, not the accelerator pressed.
- Established
- Emerging
- Contested
- Open — no answer either way
Answer: A. Curated in the Atlas as consensus established, mechanistic evidence high, human relevance plausible. Scope: Biochemical and cell-culture evidence (in vitro assays, mammalian and mouse cells, plus one review). It establishes the binding switch itself. It does not measure how much translation changes in a…
How settled is this, as the field stands? — 4E-BP1 activates Longevity
Keeping 4E-BP active extends lifespan under dietary restriction in flies, by enhancing mitochondrial activity. One of the few places where a single downstream node, not the whole pathway, carries the lifespan effect.
- Established
- Emerging
- Contested
- Open — no answer either way
Answer: B. Curated in the Atlas as consensus emerging, mechanistic evidence medium, human relevance untested. Scope: Fly only, and only under dietary restriction - the effect was not seen on a full diet.
Which study in the Atlas is this claim standing on? — 4E-BP1 inhibits eIF4E
Unphosphorylated 4E-BP1 clamps onto eIF4E and stops it assembling the cap-binding complex. mTORC1 phosphorylates 4E-BP1 to release that grip - so the brake on translation is released, not the accelerator pressed.
- MAX2009 — Molecular mechanisms of mTOR-mediated translational control (2009)
- PEA2009 — Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism (2009)
- SAB1995 — Isolation of a protein target of the FKBP12-rapamycin complex in mammalian cells (1995)
- ZID2009 — 4E-BP extends lifespan upon dietary restriction by enhancing mitochondrial activity in… (2009)
Answer: A. The Atlas records MAX2009, THO2012, SCH2003 as evidence for this step.
4E-BP1 → eIF4E
- activates
- inhibits
Answer: B. Unphosphorylated 4E-BP1 clamps onto eIF4E and stops it assembling the cap-binding complex. mTORC1 phosphorylates 4E-BP1 to release that grip - so the brake on translation is released, not the accelerator pressed.
Akt/PKB → TSC1/TSC2
- activates
- inhibits
Answer: B. Akt phosphorylates TSC2, disabling the complex. Growth-factor signalling works by removing a brake, not by pressing an accelerator.
AMPK → mTORC1
- activates
- inhibits
Answer: B. AMPK also hits mTORC1 directly by phosphorylating Raptor, imposing a metabolic checkpoint independent of TSC.
AMPK → TSC1/TSC2
- activates
- inhibits
Answer: A. When energy runs low, AMPK phosphorylates TSC2 and strengthens the brake on Rheb.
Routes to rebuild
In the game these arrive as loose parts to be put back in order. Here they are written out, with the answer.
How does a cell know it has enough raw material to grow?
Leucine ⊣ Sestrin2 ⊣ GATOR2 ⊣ GATOR1 ⊣ Rag GTPases
How does a cell learn that it is allowed to grow?
Growth hormone / IGF-1 axis → PI3K → Akt/PKB ⊣ TSC1/TSC2 ⊣ Rheb → mTORC1 → S6K1 ⊣ IRS-1 / IRS-2 — 2 of these steps is indirect: it runs through a step this route does not draw.
Thank you. Your answer was counted anonymously.