Oliver's mTOR Atlas Evidence Platform
Reading level
Mode

Pathway link RAPA-MTORC2

Rapamycin mTORC2

Rapamycin inhibits mTORC2.

Rapamycin doesn't touch mTORC2 right away, but over days it stops new mTORC2 from being built.

Rapamycin does not touch mTORC2 in the short term - but over days it traps free mTOR and prevents new mTORC2 from being assembled.

The conditions it holds under

Strictly time- and cell-type-dependent: absent acutely, present after prolonged exposure, and the sensitivity varies between cell lines. LAM2012 shows the same loss of mTORC2 signalling in mouse liver in vivo, so this is not a cell-culture-only phenomenon. Treating this edge as unconditional is a common error.

Time it takes
long exposure (days to weeks)
Step
indirect (through steps not drawn here)
Measured in
mammalian cells
Where in the cell
cytosol
Reaches people?
plausible in people, not shown directly
How settled
settled in the literature

Studies behind it

YearEvidenceStudy
2006 M Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKBSAR2006 The molecular explanation for rapamycin's dark side. Short-term rapamycin only hits mTORC1, but prolonged treatment can also inhibit the assembly of NEW mTORC2 in susceptible cell types, reducing mTORC2 abundance and cutting Akt signaling over time. The wording matters: this is prevention of new assembly, not the dismantling of complexes already built, and the response depends on cell context and length of exposure. This is the mechanistic root of the insulin-resistance side effect later shown in mice (see Lamming 2012) - crucial for anyone dosing rapamycin for longevity.
2012 A Rapamycin-induced insulin resistance is mediated by mTORC2 loss and uncoupled from longevityLAM2012 Chronic rapamycin (about 2 mg/kg a day, close to the lifespan-extending dose) made mice glucose intolerant and insulin resistant. A clamp test placed the problem in the liver, which kept making glucose, while muscle and fat took up glucose normally. Removing mTORC1 from the liver did not cause this. Rapamycin did break up mTORC2 (it separated mTOR from Rictor) in liver, fat and muscle, and deleting Rictor in the liver alone reproduced the glucose problem. In the genetic part, female mice with one working copy each of mTOR and mLST8 had about 50% less mTORC1 signalling in the liver, normal mTORC2 signalling and normal glucose tolerance, and lived 14.4% longer on average (p = 0.046). Males did not. Boundary: mouse drug and genetics work, not people, and the lifespan gain is female-only. It supports separating the two effects, but the paper does not test a drug that blocks mTORC1 without touching mTORC2.

Points the other way

No study in the Atlas contradicts this link. That means none in this curated set, not none in the literature.

Who has checked this

Checked by
No researcher outside the project has checked this link yet.
Curator sign-off
Not signed off yet. This link was drafted with AI help and has not been reviewed link by link; treat it as a proposal until it is.
Curated by
Oliver Barton, with AI help for drafting; see how links are checked.

“Inhibits” describes the effect on the target's activity, not on how much of it there is.

“How settled” describes how far researchers in the field agree. It is not the same as the sign-off above, which only says whether a named curator has checked this page.

If this link rests on your own work: a click on “This looks right” below, or a short note through “Report an error”, helps us more than anything else on this page.

← The whole pathway · This link as JSON

Spotted something wrong or out of date about this link?
Was this page useful?