Pathway link BISTERIC-MTORC1
Bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors mTORC1
Bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors inhibits mTORC1.
A two-part drug grips mTORC1 at two places at once, which blocks it more completely than rapamycin-type drugs. So far only a first safety trial in people with advanced tumours has reported on it.
The conditions it holds under
Phase 1 in advanced solid tumours – a safety and pharmacodynamic result, not an efficacy verdict. Directness is graded indirect because, like rapalogs, the mechanism requires FKBP12. Consensus is emerging: one trial.
- Time it takes
- hours
- Step
- indirect (through steps not drawn here)
- Measured in
- human
- Where in the cell
- lysosome
- Reaches people?
- plausible in people, not shown directly
- How settled
- emerging, few independent studies
Studies behind it
| Year | Evidence | Study |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | H | The Bi-steric, mTORC1-Selective Inhibitor, RMC-5552, in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase 1 TrialSCH2025 First-in-human, open-label dose-escalation trial (n=57, advanced solid tumors, no comparator arm) of a bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitor. Treatment-related hyperglycemia was low (4%) and not dose-limiting, alongside a 64% disease control rate. Because the trial was uncontrolled and made no head-to-head comparison against rapamycin or an ATP-site inhibitor, this is encouraging early clinical evidence consistent with the hypothesis that sparing mTORC2 reduces metabolic toxicity -- it does not establish mTORC2 sparing as the cause. |
Points the other way
No study in the Atlas contradicts this link. That means none in this curated set, not none in the literature.
Who has checked this
- Checked by
- No researcher outside the project has checked this link yet.
- Curator sign-off
- Not signed off yet. This link was drafted with AI help and has not been reviewed link by link; treat it as a proposal until it is.
- Curated by
- Oliver Barton, with AI help for drafting; see how links are checked.
← The whole pathway · This link as JSON
Thank you. Your answer was counted anonymously.
Thank you. That helps us know which pages have been read by someone who knows the work.
Thank you. We will check it and correct the page.