Pathway link RAPA-LAM
Rapamycin Lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Rapamycin inhibits Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.
In a clinical trial, rapamycin stabilised lung function in a rare lung disease while patients kept taking it – the decline came back once they stopped.
The conditions it holds under
Benefit is suppressive: lung function declined again after withdrawal.
- Time it takes
- long exposure (days to weeks)
- Step
- indirect (through steps not drawn here)
- Measured in
- human
- Reaches people?
- shown in people
- How settled
- settled in the literature
Studies behind it
| Year | Evidence | Study |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | H | Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis (MILES)MCC2011 MILES was a 12-month placebo-controlled trial of sirolimus in 89 women with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a rare lung disease driven by overactive mTOR. On placebo, lung function (FEV1) fell by about 12 ml a month. On sirolimus it held steady (+1 ml a month), a 153 ml difference over the year. In the next year nobody took the drug, and the sirolimus group's decline resumed in parallel with placebo, so the benefit lasted only while the drug was taken. Walking distance and gas-transfer capacity did not improve. Boundary: patients had fairly advanced disease (average FEV1 about 48% of predicted), many dropped out of the observation year, and mouth ulcers and rashes may have revealed who was on the drug. Sirolimus was held at a blood level of 5 to 15 ng/ml, so this was continuous dosing, not intermittent. |
Points the other way
No study in the Atlas contradicts this link. That means none in this curated set, not none in the literature.
Who has checked this
- Checked by
- No researcher outside the project has checked this link yet.
- Curator sign-off
- Not signed off yet. This link was drafted with AI help and has not been reviewed link by link; treat it as a proposal until it is.
- Curated by
- Oliver Barton, with AI help for drafting; see how links are checked.
← The whole pathway · This link as JSON
Spotted something wrong or out of date about this link?
Thank you. That helps us know which pages have been read by someone who knows the work.
Thank you. We will check it and correct the page.
Was this page useful?
Thank you. Your answer was counted anonymously.