Oliver's mTOR Atlas Evidence Platform
Reading level
Mode

Pathway link AKT-TSC

Akt/PKB TSC1/TSC2

Akt/PKB inhibits TSC1/TSC2.

Akt tags TSC2 to disable it. Growth signals work by releasing a brake, not by pressing a gas pedal.

Akt phosphorylates TSC2, disabling the complex. Growth-factor signalling works by removing a brake, not by pressing an accelerator.

The conditions it holds under

In mouse liver, Akt phosphorylation of TSC2 is the main route by which insulin switches on mTORC1, but feeding activates hepatic mTORC1 without it; that response needs dietary protein instead (KAL2026). The biochemical mechanism itself was shown in cultured human cells (INO2002).

Time it takes
seconds
Step
direct (one molecule acts on the other)
Measured in
mammalian cells
Where in the cell
cytosol
Reaches people?
plausible in people, not shown directly
How settled
settled in the literature

Studies behind it

YearEvidenceStudy
2002 M TSC2 is phosphorylated and inhibited by Akt and suppresses mTOR signallingINO2002 Akt directly phosphorylates and inactivates TSC2, disrupting the TSC1-TSC2 complex and releasing its inhibition of mTOR - the link between growth-factor/insulin signaling and mTORC1 activation.
2026 A Dietary protein governs the role of insulin signaling in the postprandial regulation of hepatic mTORC1.KAL2026 In liver-specific mouse genetic models, AKT-mediated TSC2 phosphorylation is the main route by which insulin induces hepatic mTORC1, but is dispensable for feeding-induced activation; postprandial mTORC1 activation instead requires dietary protein, and hepatic mTORC1 signalling is not elevated in diet-induced obesity despite impaired insulin/glucose homeostasis.
2026 A Feeding-Induced Muscle mTORC1 Signaling Regulates Postprandial Protein Synthesis and Endurance but Not Muscle SizeLAP2026 Using a mouse model expressing an AKT-nonphosphorylatable TSC2 mutant specifically in skeletal muscle, the Manning lab genetically separated feeding-induced from contraction-induced mTORC1 activation. AKT-mediated TSC2 phosphorylation is required for feeding (but not contraction) to activate muscle mTORC1 and drive postprandial protein synthesis — yet mice lacking this feeding-induced signal have normal muscle mass and myofiber size, and instead show improved maximal endurance capacity with a modest rise in mitochondrial content. The finding dissociates mTORC1's role in postprandial anabolism from its role in maintaining steady-state muscle mass, and is a directly relevant data point for whether the pattern/source of mTORC1 activation (feeding vs. mechanical) — not just its average level — shapes downstream outcomes.

Points the other way

No study in the Atlas contradicts this link. That means none in this curated set, not none in the literature.

Who has checked this

Checked by
No researcher outside the project has checked this link yet.
Curator sign-off
Not signed off yet. This link was drafted with AI help and has not been reviewed link by link; treat it as a proposal until it is.
Curated by
Oliver Barton, with AI help for drafting; see how links are checked.

“Inhibits” describes the effect on the target's activity, not on how much of it there is.

“How settled” describes how far researchers in the field agree. It is not the same as the sign-off above, which only says whether a named curator has checked this page.

If this link rests on your own work: a click on “This looks right” below, or a short note through “Report an error”, helps us more than anything else on this page.

← The whole pathway · This link as JSON

Was this page useful?
Spotted something wrong or out of date about this link?