Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma

Hudes G et al. · 2007 · New England Journal of Medicine · Atlas ID HUD2007

Temsirolimus alone extended median overall survival to 10.9 months versus 7.3 months with interferon alfa in poor-prognosis metastatic kidney cancer; rash, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia were more common with temsirolimus.

At a glance

Evidence tierB Direct human evidence
Study type2 - Human Clinical Trial
Model systemHumans, phase III RCT (n=626)
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Year2007
Peer reviewedYes
SourceDOI 10.1056/NEJMoa066838 · PMID 17538086

Abstract

Interferon alfa is widely used for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma but has limited efficacy and tolerability. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, may benefit patients with this disease. In this multicenter, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 626 patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma to receive 25 mg of intravenous temsirolimus weekly, 3 million U of interferon alfa (with an increase to 18 million U) subcutaneously three times weekly, or combination therapy with 15 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus 6 million U of interferon alfa three times weekly. The primary end point was overall survival in comparisons of the temsirolimus group and the combination-therapy group with the interferon group. Patients who received temsirolimus alone had longer overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.92; P=0.008) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) than did patients who received interferon alone. Overall survival in the combination-therapy group did not differ significantly from that in the interferon group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.20; P=0.70). Median overall survival times in the interferon group, the temsirolimus group, and the combination-therapy group were 7.3, 10.9, and 8.4 months, respectively. Rash, peripheral edema, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia were more common in the temsirolimus group, whereas asthenia was more common in the interferon group. There were fewer patients with serious adverse events in the temsirolimus group than in the interferon group (P=0.02). As compared with interferon alfa, temsirolimus improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis. The addition of temsirolimus to interferon did not improve survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00065468 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Extracted findings

InterventionTemsirolimus (± interferon alfa)
TargetmTOR
ModelHuman – phase III RCT (n=626, poor-prognosis RCC)
EffectTemsirolimus improved overall survival vs interferon alfa in poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma

Related topics

mTORRenal cell carcinoma (RCC)Temsirolimus

Open in the Atlas explorer